Ethical Dilemmas: A Path to Truth

By Alice Barakagwira

Back in Fall 2014, in the Introduction to Human Services course, we were having

a conversation about whether there are links between one’s belief in God, or a lack of

belief in God, and one’s health. This conversation was originated from the conception of

mental health in my culture. Back home in Burundi, it’s very rare to see an individual

who seeks help from medical providers for mental health. Mental health is believed to

be a spiritual issue. For this reason, mental health problems are treated within religious

settings. And I have witnessed people being healed because of their faith.

One of my classmates asked where she would have gone for help since she

doesn’t believe in God. Just out of curiosity, I asked her why she doesn’t believe in God,

and the response was that God doesn’t exist. According to her, God doesn’t exist

because she never saw God. The conversation went on and I asked her how, if God is

in Burundi, and because she has never been in Burundi, wouldn’t it be possible for her

to meet God? And by the fact that she hasn’t been in Burundi doesn’t deny the

existence of God. This conversation that I had with my classmate shows me how much

we count on science, or maybe on our own ignorance.

Because of the advancement and success of science, there is often a tendency

to think that science can explain everything. I agree that science has contributed

countless benefits to human life on planet Earth. I am grateful for the work of scientists

who devoted their lives to the study of this discipline and all the advantages scientific

advances give us. However, I do believe that there is such a thing as transcendent

morality, something that rises above the natural world, or something that transcends the

natural world.

One of the key moral principles that I can think of is “Moral Truth.” By definition a

statement is true when it corresponds with reality. In other words, a statement is true

when it matches up with the way the world really is. It looks like when we come to moral

truth, we do change the definition of what moral truth is. Here, everyone tends to have

his/her own truth. What is your favorite food? The response here is subjective. I may

favor seafood and you don’t. But if, for example, two people have different opinions

about the morality of an action, both cannot be right, and there is only one right answer.

Similarly, if two cultures have different standards for morality, both cannot be correct. In

fact, maybe both are incorrect.

I believe truth never changes. Truth is truth whether you stand for it or not. In

other words, truth is God because he never changes. Truth is what comes from Him.

Man has discovered scientifically observable, testable explanations for many physical

phenomena. Science is not the only way of knowing and understanding. But science is

a way of knowing that differs from other ways. Moral laws cannot be tested in this

sense; moral laws result from the belief in God and in God’s word.

To conclude, one cannot have moral laws in place without a moral law giver.

Morality comes from God. He is the author and creator of everything good and true. But

with free will, it is up to us to want to listen, or not through the Holy Spirit. People who

choose not to listen to Him try to make up their own morality, contrary to the word of

God, but it is actually false. There is only one lawgiver, that’s God. His word and his

laws are truths. True morality cannot come from anyone or anything else.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s